Markets
Jensen Huang in front of Vera Rubin at CES 2026
(Nvidia)

What Wall Street’s saying about Nvidia’s Q1 results

A makeover beautifies the growth outlook; so does the CPU opportunity.

Luke Kawa

Shares of Nvidia are lower for the fourth straight time after releasing quarterly results (despite another tidy top- and bottom-line beat). The good news for bulls is that the day-after reaction hasn’t been a good guide to what the stock does after that.

“We ignore this noise,” wrote Bank of America analyst Vivek Arya, who raised his price target on the stock to $350 from $320, and most of his peers agreed.

Zooming out, Wall Street analysts liked what they saw and heard from CEO Jensen Huang and CFO Colette Kress on Wednesday, with many boosting their view on how the shares will climb.

Here’s what they highlighted:

Corporate makeover

One of the most interesting things to come out of Nvidia’s quarterly results wasn’t just the numbers, but the new way in which they’re being arranged.

In particular, Nvidia is subdividing its “data center” revenues between hyperscale customers and everything else (formally, AI Clouds, Industrial, and Enterprise, or ACIE) in a bid to highlight its competitive advantage in the latter.

Revenues from each of these segments were roughly equal in Q1, though hyperscale sales are growing far faster than ACIE (74% versus 11%).

Megacap tech companies might have specific demands for the components going into their data centers (and in the case of many, custom chips), but Nvidia believes where its offerings really stand out is for the other cohort of clients who just want AI compute to be delivered to them (a full-stack solution, or off-the-rack racks, if you prefer).

“There’s a whole category of data centers that semi-custom chips just don’t apply because these data centers want to buy systems, they want to operate systems — they don’t want to design, they don’t want to build it themselves,” Huang said on the conference call. “We’re fairly unique in our ability to be able to serve this industry.”

These customers are all individually way smaller than the hyperscalers, but all these little wins would add up big over time, he argued.

“Jensen mentioned he expects ACIE to grow faster in the longer-term given that there are more potential customers in the segment and these customers do not want to design their own compute but rather have an off the shelf solution (where NVDA’s share is very high),” wrote Needham & Co. analyst Quinn Bolton, who hiked his price target to $270 from $240.

“NVDA has a near-monopoly here via AI factories and full-platform support — areas which custom ASICs cannot address,” BofA’s Arya added.

However, this shift toward data center growth dominated by non-hyperscale opportunities seems more like the beginning of a story that’ll be written in 2028 than beyond, mainly because...

$1 trillion and counting

When asked about incremental top-line drivers beyond the $1 trillion revenue target for Blackwell and Vera Rubin sales through the end of next year, Huang pointed to three things:

  1. More sales to frontier AI models (namely, Anthropic)

  2. Stand-alone Vera CPU sales

  3. LPX (an AI inference accelerator developed with Groq)

Conspicuous by omission here is any reference to that non-hyperscale ACIE category.

Analysts primarily keyed in on door No. 2 here, with Huang saying that he expects to deliver $20 billion in “stand-alone” Vera CPU revenues this year.

“The company seems set to potentially become the CPU king with a possible business as big or even bigger than their more traditional competitors in an overall new (incremental) TAM they size at $200 billion,” wrote Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon, who lifted his price target to $315 from $300.

Semi stocks with a high CPU footprint like Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, and Arm Holdings have outperformed in 2026 as the “orchestration” demands of AI agents boost the prominence of these older-school offerings in running models.

“We are excited for this opportunity and think that NVIDIA’s strong procurement will put them in a very strong position in a supply constrained environment,” said Morgan Stanley’s Joseph Moore, who nudged up his price target to $288 from $285.

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.