Markets
Hims oral semaglutide
A screenshot from forhers.com showing oral semaglutide (Sherwood News)

Novo sues Hims, alleging patent infringement

The Department of Health and Human Services’ top lawyer said last week that it referred Hims to the Department of Justice.

J. Edward Moreno

Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk said Monday it has sued Hims & Hers, accusing it of infringing on one of its key patents for semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy.

Shares of Hims extended losses to trade down 20% in the premarket, while Novo rose nearly 6%, though it pared some of its earlier gains.

The move comes after Hims launched — then abruptly discontinued — copies of Novos Wegovy pill, the first GLP-1 pill approved for weight loss. Hims still sells copies of Novos injectable GLP-1s.

Hims has engaged in promotional campaigns that highlight its compounded semaglutide products, duping consumers and healthcare professionals as to the clinical benefits and safety of these unapproved drugs, the drugmaker said in a statement.

Hims said in a statement that the lawsuit is a blatant attack by a Danish company on millions of Americans who rely on compounded medications for access to personalized care.

Once again, Big Pharma is weaponizing the US judicial system to limit consumer choice, the company said. This lawsuit attacks more than just one medication or company — it directly assaults a well-established, vital component of US pharmacy practice that has improved patient care for everything from obesity to infertility to cancer.

Its short-lived launch of an oral semaglutide product appeared to be a tipping point for Novo and regulators, which until now had not taken aggressive action against Hims despite critiquing its behavior.

The patent Novo is accusing Hims of violating encompasses both oral and injectable semaglutide, meaning the suit not only threatens Hims’ newly launched and discontinued pill, but also the injectable versions it has been selling for much longer.

Hims legal woes mount

Hims launched its copy of Novos Wegovy pill Thursday morning. Hours later, Novo released a statement threatening “legal and regulatory action” against Hims. That evening, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said in an X post that the agency would “take swift action against companies mass-marketing illegal copycat drugs.”

Mike Stuart, the top lawyer at the Department of Health and Human Services, the FDAs parent agency, said in a post on X on Friday that he has referred Hims to the Department of Justice for investigation for potential violations by Hims of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and applicable Title 18 provisions.

It is unclear when or if the DOJ may take action against Hims. The FDCA carries both civil and criminal implications. Less than a day after Stuarts post, Hims said it would discontinue the pill.

Novos lawsuit, meanwhile, is the latest salvo in a nearly yearlong battle between the two companies.

Hims and other telehealth companies began selling cheaper copies of Novo’s injectable weight-loss drug in 2024 while they were allowed to because the drug was in a shortage. Even after the shortage ended, Hims continued to sell copies it says are “personalized” for patients.

Novo has expressed frustration that regulators have not cracked down on this legal loophole. Novo lowered its cash-pay prices and forged partnerships with other telehealth companies, including at one point Hims. That partnership was short-lived and ended epically in June after Hims did not stop selling copies of Novos drugs.

Novo has sued smaller players, mostly alleging false advertising, not patent infringement. Those lawsuits have been largely unsuccessful.

Hims CEO Andrew Dudum has consistently said that the company wouldnt back down from pressure from Big Pharma. In a statement after Novos warnings but before the FDAs, Hims dismissed the drugmakers attacks as outdated.

This is not the first time (nor will it be the last time) a big pharma company has suggested taking an accessible, customer-first approach to healthcare is dangerous, illegal, or bad for the marketplace, the company said in a statement. This narrative is as predictable as it is outdated and false.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.