Markets
Hand Holding Lit Match
Getty Images
Correction detection

The Nasdaq Composite Index is now down 10% from its December peak

Tariffs and geopolitical tensions have sparked a sell-off, with high-flying tech stocks getting smacked.

David Crowther

On Friday, March 10, 2000, nearly 25 years ago to the day, the Nasdaq Composite — a growth-heavy index often synonymous with tech stocks — peaked at 5048.62 before slipping 2.8% in the following Monday’s trading.

At the time, investors had no idea what was to come, as that small release of pressure turned into a bump, which turned into a correction, which turned into a full-blown pop for the dot-com bubble that had turned an entire generation of web 1.0 entrepreneurs into paper millionaires. It took 15 years for the market to climb out of the crater it had eventually sunk into, with the Nasdaq Composite down 78% from its peak at its worst.

NASDAQ Drawdown
Sherwood News

Though things are very different today from that fateful time at the turn of the millennium, the same Nasdaq index has once again entered correction territory — falling 10.4% since its December 16 peak, as concerns over tariffs, trade, and geopolitical tensions weighed on stocks this week. Broader indexes, like the S&P 500, which is down only 6.6% from its high, haven’t hit the correction milestone yet.

While the urge to be alarmist is strong, this is, of course, a fairly regular occurrence. Stocks can’t go up forever, even if we’d like them to, and a drop of 10% has happened dozens of times before. What’s more, unlike in 2000, many of the companies that have seen their share prices soar over the last 24 months have real business momentum. Just yesterday, Broadcom reported a blockbuster set of numbers, with profits more than quadrupling to $5.5 billion in Q1.

History suggests that if we do enter a prolonged downturn, tech stocks with stretched valuations could be in for a lot more pain. It goes without saying, however, that dot-com darlings like Pets.com, and even giants like Cisco, were never posting $5.5 billion of quarterly profits.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

United beats Q1 earnings and revenue estimates, lowers full-year profit guidance amid surging jet fuel prices

United Airlines reported its first-quarter earnings results after the bell on Tuesday. The carrier’s shares ticked down in after-hours trading.

For Q1, United reported:

  • Adjusted earnings of $1.19 per share, compared to the Wall Street estimate of $1.08 per share compiled by FactSet.

  • $14.6 billion in revenue, compared to the $14.39 billion consensus estimate.

In the first quarter, United’s fuel expense grew 12.6% from the same period last year to $3.04 billion.

For the second quarter, United expects adjusted earnings per share of between $1 and $2, shy of Wall Street expectations of $2.08. For the full year ahead, United said it expects earnings between $7 and $11 per share, compared to its prior guidance of between $12 and $14 per share.

“Guidance assumes United’s revenue recovers 40% to 50% of the fuel price increases in the second quarter, 70% to 80% of the fuel price increases in the third quarter and 85% to 100% of the fuel price increases in the fourth quarter 2026,” read the company’s investor update.

Earlier this month, United was among the first major US airlines to hike its bag fees amid higher fuel costs. Its shares have fallen more than 15% from a February high days before the war in Iran began.

United has also made waves this month following reports that CEO Scott Kirby had floated the idea of a merger with American Airlines to President Trump. A merger between two of the big four airlines would create a true US behemoth, controlling more than a third of the American market. American Air last week said it wasn’t interested in merging with United and hadn’t held talks on the idea. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that he doesn’t like the idea either.

markets

Hedge funds are following retail traders into the Magnificent 7

Hedge funds are following retail traders into the stocks the masses never stopped buying.

“As we kick off earnings for megacap tech stocks, this stood out: [hedge funds] have started buying Mag7 stocks again this month though positioning remains well below the peak levels seen in early 2016,” wrote Goldman Sachs’ Cullen Morgan.

Goldman PB Mag 7
Source: Goldman Sachs

In early April, JPMorgan strategist Arun Jain noted that retail investors had basically been selling everything but the Magnificent 7 stocks as part of a more cautious stance due to the Iran war.

(Apple has been a long-standing exception to this trend, presumably because retail traders arent fond of its hands-off approach to AI.)

JPM Retail flows

Last August, Jain discussed how retail activity tended to “crowd in” institutional buyers in meme stocks, while Goldman’s John Marshall advised clients to piggyback on stocks beloved by retail traders. Speculative, retail-geared assets proceeded to go on a tremendous run that soured in October.

But there are some early indications that a similar bout of speculative fervor is bubbling up once more.

markets

POET Technologies surges above $10 for first time in 4 years amid explosion in call volumes

POET Technologies is up nearly 40% this week as options market activity goes haywire in a faint echo of what got the stock on retail traders’ radars in October.

As of 11:12 a.m. ET, more than 10 calls have changed hands for every put traded. This bullish impulse has propelled the stock above the $10 threshold for the first time since March 2022.

Shares of the optical communications firm briefly dipped last week after Wolfpack Research said it was short the company because its investors would be exposed to an “IRS tax nightmare.”

The company responded that day saying it was taking measures for US shareholders that “should mitigate certain potential adverse US federal income tax consequences to it that could otherwise result from the Company’s status as a passive foreign investment company.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.