Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

How the character of the AI trade has changed — for the worse — in 2026

A smattering of observations on how the character of the AI trade has changed this year — with, obviously, some of these trends not having waited for a full turn of the Earth around the sun to start to establishing themselves:

  • All the bullish oxygen is being sucked out of the room and squarely into the memory chip shortage, which is offering bumper profits for a handful of firms. On a related note, semicap equipment stocks have been an upstream beneficiary of this dynamic. The underlying message is that near-term scarcity is being rewarded by the market.

  • That the big capex spenders will generate a high return on investment from their outlays is not something traders are willing to take for granted. Big budgets are not necessarily getting applauded; even companies that seemingly earn the benefit of the doubt by posting accelerating revenue growth, à la Meta, aren’t able to maintain those gains for long.

  • The big “consumers” of memory chips are getting squeezed. This includes the hyperscalers, obviously, but even more so the likes of Qualcomm, which has to wait behind these giants in line for supplies, which played a role in the company’s underwhelming outlook.

  • For public markets, the theme is more of a net negative than a positive. Firms seen as the most likely to be disrupted by AI (basically, the entire software industry) are getting indiscriminately clobbered, regardless of how good their quarterly results and guidance are.

  • The facilitators of disruption, in many cases, have not yet arrived on public markets but plan to do so this year. That’s SpaceX/xAI, OpenAI, and Anthropic. So if the AI theme has seemed a little “negative sum” in this year, that might be about the room that investment firms know they’re going to need in their portfolios to add these stocks once they’re able to (or, in some cases, ahead of time).

  • And this isn’t really a 2026 dynamic, strictly speaking, but the two biggest chip companies have been dead money for months. Since the end of Q3, Nvidia and Broadcom are both negative, with the S&P 500 up about 2% over this span.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.