Markets
Lincoln Center Alternative Investment Gala
Point72 CEO and founder Steven A. Cohen (Dave Kotinsky/Getty Images)

Hedge funds are ditching MBAs for MDs

Wall Street is sourcing new hires from an unlikely location: hospitals.

Hedge funds’ hottest new recruiting classes aren’t coming from business schools and investment banks; they’re coming from… hospitals. Earlier this week, Reuters reported that hedge funds including Balyasny, D.E. Shaw, Point72, Schonfeld, Qube, and Squarepoint are hiring “doctors, scientists, and analysts” to give expert insights on pharmaceutical stocks.

All companies experience volatile moves based on good and bad earnings reports, but the stock prices of pharmaceutical companies, specifically, can double or collapse depending on drug-trial performances. Hiring doctors with domain expertise, therefore, can be incredibly lucrative for hedge funds if it helps them place bets before drug-trial results are released.

A good example: on November 25, Cassava Sciences announced that it would stop all trials of its Alzheimer’s disease drug after it failed a late-stage study, sending the stock down from $26.48 on Friday, November 22, to $4.30 on Monday, November 25. Data from the study showed that volunteers who took the drug in the company’s phase 3 trial performed no better in cognitive or everyday-life activities than volunteers on the placebo.

If an investor had shorted SAVA on Friday, they could have netted a return of over 80% on Monday when the results were released. Interestingly, Martin Shkreli, the infamous “pharma bro” who was sentenced to prison for securities fraud in 2017, published a 38-page paper on why simufilam, Cassava’s drug, couldn’t possibly work, and he predicted that the stock would trade to the company’s cash value of $2 to $3 per share.

Regardless of your opinion on Shkreli’s past business practices, the man knows biotech stocks better than most. He has spent the better part of his career 1) shorting biotech stocks while working for/running hedge funds, and 2) managing pharmaceutical companies, giving him detailed domain knowledge. Anyone who read his report and shorted the stock accordingly would have made a lot of money. Not bad!

It’s no surprise, then, that hedge funds have decided to try to capture some of this alpha. I imagine it’s a pretty easy sell. You just approach doctors who have been on the operating table for a few years and say, “Hey, we’ll pay you ___ million dollars to help us figure out which of these pharmaceutical trials are legit and which ones are fake.” If you’re a doctor who is tired of the grueling schedule in the operating room, doesn’t want to deal with the ins and outs of the healthcare system, and would like a (likely) pay increase, it’s kind of a no-brainer, no? Plus, it’s probably a good culture fit:

“‘The prospect of falling rates has seen multi-strategy hedge funds ramp up their hiring in healthcare,’ Freddie Stacy, co-founder of recruitment firm Sheridan Executive, said…

Ex-doctors are attractive because if you can deal with the kind of extreme trauma seen daily by the medical profession, you can certainly handle draw-downs on a trading floor.’

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.