Markets
The Future of the AI boom is coming into view
(CSA Archive/Getty Images)

GE Vernova and Vertiv are giving us a glimpse into the future of the AI boom

GEV’s backlogs are bursting at the seams. One analyst told us he thinks that by the end of this year, GEV could be completely sold out of production capacity for heavy-duty turbines until 2029 or 2030.

There’s no shortage of CEOs willing to declare — with dead certainty — what the future holds.

Usually they’re of the Silicon Valley variety, laying out futuristic visions of humanoid robots and endless AI productivity gains.

That’s nice and all. But for the non-visionaries among us, the tendency of these guys (they’re mostly guys) to gloss over nuts-and-bolts business details makes their predictions less than bankable.

Do they have enough money to make their vision a reality? A sufficient strategy to take on incumbents and competitors? The right regulatory relationships to navigate hurdles?

Those tech visionaries can be tough to pin down on the details.

And then there’s what we got today: two earnings reports from the picks-and-shovel AI companies that actually support the massive build-outs. First, we got numbers from an honest-to-god metal-bending industrial company at the heart of the AI data center boom. Electrical equipment and gas turbine maker GE Vernova’s results provided a sturdy block of evidence that the AI boom has room to run.

Order backlogs at GE Vernova — one of three companies spun out of industrial icon GE just over two years ago — jumped 32% to a new high of $163.28 billion during the three months that ended March 31, underscoring the fact that the data center build-out could last for years.

“In the quarter, our Electrification segment booked $2.4 billion in equipment orders to support data centers, more than all of last year,” GE Vernova CEO Scott Strazik said in the company’s press release.

The surge in orders is why Chris Dendrinos, an analyst covering the company for RBC Capital Markets, thinks GE Vernova will be completely sold out of its production capacity for heavy-duty turbines through 2029 — and possibly into 2030 — by the end of this year.

“Backlogs are getting longer and prices are getting higher because the hyperscalers are willing to lock in the orders for three years out into the future,” Dendrinos said.  

To be sure, orders are not the same thing as actual sales.

And those warning about the risk of the AI boom going bust can point to previous episodes where panicky buyers doubled up orders of tough-to-get equipment from multiple suppliers, only to walk away when demand from their own customers softened. The result can be a sharp downturn in activity that leaves a glut of unprofitable inventory.

Dendrinos says GE Vernova’s order numbers should be taken seriously in part because they represent large amounts of money — up to 25% of the cost of a turbine — that utilities, hyperscalers, and other customers plonk down when they make firm commitments to buy. Such “firm” commitments accounted for 44% of the company’s equipment order book in Q1.

The other half of the orders (less than ironclad commitments known as a “slot reservations”) also require deposits from customers, he said.

What’s more, given the rush to secure power for data centers — GEV’s gas turbines are a key part of the on-site power plants data centers now often require — the company can mitigate the risk that when push comes to shove, buyers can’t or won’t meet their commitments.

“GEV’s got more demand than they have slots. They can be choosy as to who they want to work with,” Dendrinos said. “They favor utility companies because utilities don’t default, or really high-quality large hyperscaler customers that are going to follow through.”

The run-up in GE Vernova shares suggests the market is convinced.

But Vertiv Holdings, another stock at the white-hot center of the data center boom, had a different experience.

It too reported better-than-expected results early Wednesday. But last quarter, the maker of power and cooling equipment for AI data centers told the market that it would stop offering quarterly backlog data, after reporting a massive 250% surge in remaining orders that sent its shares up sharply.

(Officials cited the lumpiness of such orders as a reason to cut the quarterly releases, though they will continue to release backlog data on an annual basis.)

Without that data, the market focused on Vertiv’s guidance for the coming quarter. Vertiv said it expects adjusted earnings per share of between $1.37 and $1.43 next quarter, mostly below the $1.43 consensus estimate. It also guided for net sales of $3.25 billion to $3.45 billion in Q2, compared to Wall Street’s call for $3.40 billion. The stock sold off, but after a run-up of 300% over the last year, it’s not the end of the world. Expectations were clearly pretty high.

So, what’s the lesson? Well, one takeaway may be that after the ride investors have had on some of these AI stocks, they’ll need almost constant reassurance that the boom still has legs.

GE Vernova’s report provided it; the stock went up. Vertiv didn’t. Shares fell.

Expect similar dynamics as we roll through the next few weeks of earnings.

After all, AI stocks are pretty important: almost all the S&P 500’s top performers this year are heavily reliant on the ongoing boom for both their revenues and the bullish sentiment that’s driven up their shares. That includes memory plays like Sandisk (the top performer in the S&P), Western Digital, and Seagate, as well as optical networking stocks like Lumentum, Ciena Corp., Corning, and Coherent.

In fact, Goldman Sachs analysts recently estimated that AI investment spending is likely to account for roughly 40% of all earnings growth for members of the S&P 500 this year.

So yeah, the outlook for that spending is kind of important. And any incremental glimpse of the future companies provide will be watched incredibly closely.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.