Markets
Collision 2019 - Day One
Alan Baratz of D-Wave Quantum (David Fitzgerald/Getty Images)
The Art of the Science Deal

D-Wave CEO’s pitch to the Trump administration: Buy our quantum computers in exchange for an equity stake

“I want them to get something of value in return, not just equity in the company, but I want them to get products that they can actually use to solve their hard problems,” said D-Wave CEO Dr. Alan Baratz.

Luke Kawa

Over the past few months, the biggest catalyst for quantum computing stocks has been the prospect of government support. This was nurtured by agreements between pure-play companies in the space and the likes of the Department of Energy and the Air Force Research Laboratory, and gained further traction when the US government highlighted quantum technology as an R&D budgetary priority for fiscal 2027.

But this narrative really kicked into high gear and reached its zenith on October 23, when The Wall Street Journal reported that the US government was in negotiations with several quantum computing companies about giving the US Commerce Department equity stakes in exchange for federal funding. That news was quickly seemingly contradicted by separate reporting from Reuters and Yahoo Finance.

We caught up with D-Wave Quantum CEO Dr. Alan Baratz on Wednesday following the release of Q3 earnings and asked him if the US government amassing an equity position was something he was actively pursuing, and if he wanted the government as a shareholder.

Here’s his response (emphasis added):

“So here’s my take on it. What I would like and think would be of real value to the US government is for them to purchase some of our quantum computers to use them in solving their hard defense problems, military logistics, equipment maintenance, missile placement. These quantum computers are capable of solving these hard optimizations today.

So Id say to the US government, ‘Purchase some of our systems and well give you some equity as a part of that deal.’ So I have no problem with the US government being an investor in D-Wave, an equity holder in D-Wave, but I dont think its the best use of the taxpayer money for them to kind of provide free dollars to fund R&D when were well funded already to fund our R&D.

I want them to get something of value in return, not just equity in the company, but I want them to get products that they can actually use to solve their hard problems. So I want to give them value two ways: I want to give them value by delivering products that they can make use of to solve hard problems, and at the same time, give them some equity so they can benefit from upside in the company.”

D-Wave’s flagship annealing quantum computer system is the Advantage2, which it used to produce its “quantum supremacy” result, in which the computer determined what types of materials would make for good sensors and how to fine-tune those sensors, a task that it said would be time and energy prohibitive for a classical supercomputer. The company recently struck a €10 million deal with Swiss Quantum Technology to deploy one of these systems.

This year, the Trump administration has reached deals to receive an equity stake or warrants in companies considered to be operating in strategically important industries, including rare earths miners MP Materials (in July) and Lithium Americas (in October), and, most famously, chipmaker Intel.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.