Markets
In this photo illustration a Reddit logo is seen on a mobile...
(Pavlo Gonchar/Getty Images)
Weird Money

How a Canadian carpenter became an options trader, made $300 million, and then went bust

The trader, who made and lost his fortune trading Tesla options, is suing RBC, claiming the bank’s at fault.

Jack Raines

Like many of us, Christopher DeVocht, a carpenter from Vancouver, developed a propensity for trading stocks during the pandemic. Unlike most of us, however, he was pretty good at trading stocks, turning C$88,000 into C$415 million ($306 million) between 2019 and 2022.

And then he lost it all.

On October 1, 2024, DeVocht filed a lawsuit against the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and accounting firm Grant Thornton, for, among other things, costing him C$415 million. I read through the court filing, and the details of this case are wild. 

According to the civil claim filing, in his early 20s, DeVocht regularly lost money day-trading in a personal account that he had opened through RBC, but he kept dumping more money into his account, primarily to trade Tesla. In 2019, as Tesla’s stock price climbed, his portfolio grew to C$88,000, and DeVocht decided to double down on Tesla again, and again, and again, loading up on options contracts, and it worked. By February 2020, he had C$5.5 million, and in June, his portfolio was worth C$26 million and “rising rapidly.”

In July of that year, he wanted to move out of his rental unit and purchase his own home, and he contacted a representative from RBC’s Private Banking arm to see if he could borrow against his Tesla stock to get a loan to buy a house.

Yes, instead of selling the millions of dollars that he had made on Tesla call options, he wanted to use it as collateral for a home loan.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

After he was approved to become an RBC Private Banking client, DeVocht was given an RBC financial advisor, Chris Delorme. Per the civil claim, DeVocht and RBC signed an agreement stating the following:

“RBC would be paid various fees and commissions from the products and services provided to the plaintiffs as arranged by Mr. Delorme on behalf of RBC. In return, Mr. Delorme would provide Mr. DeVocht with financial planning advice, and in doing so would exercise the care, skill and diligence reasonably expected from a professional advisor in that capacity.”

Among other responsibilities, Delorme’s team would:

  • advise Mr. DeVocht carefully and skillfully in accordance with his risk tolerance and financial objectives;

  • explain to Mr. DeVocht the risks and consequences of any financial planning strategies;

  • recommend only investments and financial planning strategies to Mr. DeVocht that were suitable, having regard to his particular circumstances, investment knowledge, financial objectives, and risk tolerance;

  • advise about and recommend strategies to minimize risks and preserve wealth.

According to the claim, RBC “failed to properly understand and verify” Mr. DeVocht’s level of sophistication in financial matters, which were pretty narrow in scope: he knew how to sling Tesla options, but that was about it.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

RBC also connected DeVocht to accounting firm Grant Thornton, which it appears provided him decent advice for minimizing his taxes: namely, trading through an LLC to cut his capital gains tax rate in half.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

Note in point 20 that according to DeVocht, besides creating an LLC, he was advised to “accumulate as many Tesla shares as possible” and hold them “as long as possible” to help lower his tax liability. So DeVocht did just that: he transferred his securities to DeVocht Corp in October 2020, and he began providing trading instructions to Delorme to execute the trades (for a fee, of course) in December of that year. DeVocht then claimed, in accordance with the tax minimization advice, he accrued “as much Tesla stock as possible through options trading and other transactions” and held it for “as long as possible.”

And for the next 11 months, it worked! By April 2021, his portfolio was worth C$186 million, and in November, it reached C$415 million. I would like to take a step back here so we can imagine what this looks like:

A 30-year-old carpenter from Vancouver approaches the Royal Bank of Canada and says, “I want to buy a house. Can I take a loan against my portfolio?” A representative from RBC’s Private Bank raises an eyebrow as he reviews a portfolio consisting of millions in Tesla call options, before shaking his hand, saying, “Of course!” and setting him up with a financial advisor. A few months later, this carpenter is calling his RBC-appointed financial advisor, instructing him to buy C$75 million in weekly Tesla call options. Of course the advisor complies: it’s the client’s money, after all! And those call options represent trading fees.

Then Tesla tanked, and DeVocht took a C$20 million personal loan from his own LLC to try to “recoup the losses” by trading his personal account, which went about as well as you’d expect:

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

This is, without a doubt, my favorite trading story of all time. I remember, in the early days of the pandemic, turning $10,000 into $30,000 trading S&P put options, before quickly roundtripping back to $10,000, but $88,000 to $415 million to “nothing” is god-tier performance. Among the reasons listed in legal basis for his suit, Devocht notes that RBC “failed to recognize Mr. DeVocht’s personal entrenchment and potential addiction to the highs and lows of RBC’s Direct Investing platform, such that he was having significant difficulty withdrawing or de-risking in light of his extraordinary success.”

I would say addiction is an understatement. While he may have lost nine figures, there is a consolation prize: his story managed to garner 6,900 upvotes on Wall Street Bets.

WSB DeVocht
Wall Street Bets post highlighting DeVocht

Capital gains are temporary; Reddit karma is forever.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

BlackBerry is on one of its hottest rallies of all time

History suggests that BlackBerry does extremely well when 1) it’s considered to be pioneering a transformative technology, or 2) there’s widespread retail enthusiasm for stocks.

If you squint (or dream), you could argue that both are going on right now.

Shares of the once-upon-a-time smartphone giant are up more than 160% over the past three months. The only times the shares have had a hotter run of form than this are at the tail end of the dot-com bubble, and in early 2021 when was it part of the meme stock craze headlined by GameStop.

Let’s start with the easy part first — here’s Scott Rubner, head of equity and equity derivatives strategy at Citadel, on retail’s significant footprint in the shares’ rally:

“Retail traders are the new price setters in the market. May volumes across our retail cash equities and options platforms are currently tracking at record levels. Daily volumes on our cash platform are setting new highs and are on pace to finish nearly ~10% above the previous record established during the January 2021 meme-stock era.”

And then there’s the harder part, part of the story that the traders bidding up BlackBerry now are dreaming about: the QNX division, which offers software that the company is positioning as an operating system for robots.

QNX’s software has early uptake in the field of autonomous driving, with BlackBerry eyeing a much more widespread role: in April, it announced a partnership to deploy this technology on Nvidia’s robotics platform. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, for his part, has long been calling for agentic AI adoption to be followed by physical AI (i.e., robots).

In a QNX press release unveiling a report this week, the company argued that software, not hardware, is the real problem in terms of making sure robotics works.

I supposed it would be poetic, in a way, if the company at the leading edge of the smartphone revolution also plays a big role in the proliferation of robotics.

markets

Micron and Sandisk rally on new Street-high price targets from Susquehanna

Micron and Sandisk both hit fresh all-time highs in early trading after Susquehanna bestowed new Wall Street-high price targets on the two memory stocks.

Analyst Mehdi Hosseini upped his view on the former to $1,750 from $600, and to $3,250 from $2,000 for the latter.

“Supply is now expected to remain tight through 2027, sustaining elevated margins and thus warranting valuation re-rating,” he wrote, per Bloomberg.

It’s the fifth time in the past year that the average price target on Micron has gone up by more than 10% in a week. UBS’s Tim Arcuri more than tripled his price target on Micron earlier this week, and has already lost the title of “most bullish.”

But even as analysts are tripping over themselves to raise their price targets on these stocks, the ferocity of the rally in Micron has outpaced their best efforts.

The high-bandwidth memory specialist traded at a record premium to the consensus Wall Street price target this week, based on data going back to 2008.

markets

Okta soars on Q1 earnings beat, raised outlook driven by AI security demand

Okta shares are surging in early trading Friday after the identity security provider posted Q1 fiscal 2027 financial results that exceeded Wall Street estimates. The strong results are fueled by accelerating corporate demand for cybersecurity software, as well as the deployment of autonomous AI systems.

Key numbers:

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.91 compared to analysts estimate of $0.85.

  • Revenue of $765 million compared to an estimate of $752.7 million.

The company generated subscription revenue of $750 million, up 11% year over year. Okta also has $271 million in free cash flow, up from $238 million in the prior years quarter.

While standard cybersecurity software protects human workers, the latest catalyst sparking Oktas strong corporate performance is the rapid emergence of autonomous AI agents that can access sensitive corporate databases and interact with privileged executive accounts.

“AI agents are rapidly becoming a new workforce inside every organization, creating a wave of identities that must be secured and governed alongside human users,” said Todd McKinnon, CEO and cofounder of Okta. “We’re expanding our opportunity as the world’s leading independent and neutral identity provider and helping customers make identity the unified control plane for their secure agentic enterprise.”

Okta raised its fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to between $3.185 billion and $3.205 billion, roughly in line with estimates of $3.18 billion. The company formally dropped its long-term projected non-GAAP tax rate from 26% down to 21%. This adjustment is a direct byproduct of the federal corporate tax frameworks under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Shares of Okta have risen around 9% since the beginning of this year.

markets

HPE, SMCI surge after Dell’s Q1 beat on strong AI server demand

HP Enterprise and Super Micro Computer shares are surging in premarket trading, getting a big boost from rival Dell’s strong Q1 results.

Dell’s $16.1 billion in AI-optimized server sales for the quarter alone proved that enterprise data center demand is accelerating faster than Wall Street had anticipated. The company posted revenue of $43.8 billion, exceeding Street estimates of $35.5 billion. Management now sees full-year sales of about $167 billion, well above the $142 billion expected by analysts.

The read-through is particularly relevant for Super Micro, one of the largest suppliers of Nvidia-powered AI server systems, and HPE, which has been expanding its AI infrastructure and liquid-cooling offerings through its partnership with Nvidia.

The moves suggest investors view AI infrastructure as a broad spending cycle that benefits server makers across the entire ecosystem.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.