Markets
In this photo illustration, Cerebras Systems logo is seen on...
(Pavlo Gonchar/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Is it bad to rely on one customer for 87% of your revenue? An AI company that’s going public is about to find out

If Nvidia takes heat for relying on just four companies for nearly half its revenue, that’s not a great sign for Cerebras.

Jack Raines

Investors have long been waiting for the proverbial IPO window to reopen, and chipmaker Cerebras Systems may be the answer to their prayers. On Monday, Cerebras, an AI chip maker, filed its S-1 to prepare for an IPO, hoping to capitalize on investor optimism in the sector by joining the public markets. However, Cerebras’s S-1 reveals some glaring issues that I’d like to discuss.

In case you’re unfamiliar with Cerebras (I was), it is the creator of the world’s largest semiconductor. While other chip makers have created smaller and smaller chips over time, Cerebras went big, literally, and its chips are the size of a dinner plate. This larger size provides processing power advantages: While Nvidia’s latest Blackwell chips have 200 billion transistors, Cerebras’s chips have 4 trillion transistors. Additionally, while Nvidia chips are heavily reliant on external memory, Cerebras’s chips host memory directly on the chip, allowing its products to more quickly complete AI inference tasks (inference is the process of using pre-trained AI models to make predictions. The other primary AI function is “training, where a model is taught how to perform a task). Cerebras claims that its chips can complete inference tasks 20 times faster than Nvidia’s GPUs.

That’s great, right? If Cerebras’s chips are 20 times faster than competitors’ products, you would think that big tech companies would be knocking down their door to buy as many as possible. But that hasn’t been happening. While tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet are spending billions on Nvidia’s chips, 87% of Cerebras’s revenue comes from “G42,” an Abu Dhabi-based AI company founded in 2018.

Critics have flagged Nvidia’s revenue concentration as a risk, noting that almost half of Nvidia’s revenue comes from just four customers, but Cerebras’s revenue concentration makes this look like child’s play. And Nvidia’s biggest customers are the largest tech companies in the world, not a six-year-old company based in Abu Dhabi. Cerebras mentioned “G42” an incredible 301 times in its S-1, noting in its risk section:

We currently generate a significant majority of our revenue from one customer, G42, and a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of customers. A reduction in demand from, or a material adverse development in our relationship with, G42 or any of our other significant customers may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The S-1 filing shows that G42 also owns a ~1% stake in Cerebras after investing in the company’s 2021 Series F, and Cerebras has granted its primary customer some… favorable terms to expand its investment. Cerebras listed a separate “Class N” stock offering reserved for G42, allowing the company to purchase $335 million in shares at $14.66 per share, a discount to its Series F price of $27.74 per share in December 2021, and G42 also has the right to purchase Class A shares at a 17.5% discount to their fair market value.

I know everyone wants to invest in the next hot AI company, and plenty of investors will probably be willing to overlook customer concentration risk, especially when that company’s revenue increased from $8.7 million through the first six months of 2023 to $136.4 million in the same period in 2024. That being said, I do think it’s worth proceeding with caution given Cerebras’s dependence on, and weird relationship with, its top customer.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.