Culture
Simpsons Movie still
Still from “The Simpsons Movie” (2007) (Everett Collection/Entertainment Weekly)

“The Simpsons Movie 2” set for release two decades after first film

For millions, the TV show’s golden era has long since passed.

In his silver screen debut back in July 2007, Homer Simpson told audiences: “I can’t believe we’re paying to see something we get on TV for free. If you ask me, everybody in this theater is a giant sucker...”

Now, the world’s most iconic TV cartoon is officially returning for a second movie spin-off — almost exactly 20 years after the original, with a premiere date set for July 2027. (Of course, this time around, frugal fans might be able to wait out the theatrical release for the flick to land on Disney+.)

And, in prophetic Simpsons fashion, it seems they’d already predicted the premiere date for the upcoming movie at the start of Season 19, immediately after the first film’s release:

Homercoming

As reported by Variety, the “Simpsons” sequel will take the place of an untitled Marvel installment in Disney’s 20th Century Studios’ slate.

Given the sheer volume of films and their impressive cultural heft, it does feel like the superhero franchise has been around for ages, but the first “Iron Man” movie only premiered in 2008 — one year after “The Simpsons Movie” hit screens, and about 19 years after the first episode of “The Simpsons” aired on TV.

Indeed, the yellow-tinted town of Springfield has been televised since 1989, making “The Simpsons” one of the longest-running TV series of all time. And, in the midst of its 37th season, with nearly 800 episodes to date, it’s still going... albeit with far fewer viewers than in its 1990s heyday.

Inspired by this “Simpsons” deep dive by Todd Schneider from 2016, and using ratings data collated on Wikipedia’s extensive list of the show’s episodes, it appears that viewership has been on a downward trajectory in the US. Only five episodes in the show’s history have topped approximately 30 million viewers — they all aired before 1991.

Some notable outliers could have more to do with timing than being timely: Episode 343, “Homer and Ned’s Hail Mary Pass,” which aired directly after Super Bowl XXXIX and starred Tom Brady and LeBron James, had a viewership of ~23 million, more than double the Season 16 average. Episode 451, “Once Upon A Time In Springfield,” meanwhile, followed a heated NFL playoff and saw a 106% viewership bump from the Season 21 average.

“Am I so out of touch? No, it’s the children who are wrong.”

While die-hard devotees of the earlier seasons are still lamenting the “Golden Age” of the show, the stark ratings decline may say less about the diminishing popularity of “The Simpsons” than the demise of cable TV more broadly.

Most TV shows don’t even make it to 100 episodes, and any series as prolific as “The Simpsons” would certainly have a chart with a very similar shape to it — we just don’t watch things like we used to. However, that doesn’t negate the fact that “The Simpsons” is also failing to break into the upper echelons of the streaming world.

Since Disney acquired the show’s long-term TV network, 21st Century Fox, in 2019, Disney+ has been the streaming home of “The Simpsons,” featuring episode sets and made-for-streaming specials — and, soon after debuting on the Fox Channel, new episodes of the upcoming season will also be released on the platform. Even so, while rival cartoons “Family Guy,” “South Park,” and “American Dad!” all broke Nielsen’s top 20 most streamed shows for the first half of 2025, the Simpson family was nowhere to be seen.

Still, if linear TV viewership continues slumping into 2027, capitalizing on the growing market for animated family-friendly movies could be a perfectly cromulent way for the franchise to recapture the “Bartmania” seen in decades past.

More Culture

See all Culture
culture

Xbox cuts price of its Game Pass subscription by 23%, removes new “Call of Duty” games

A Halley’s Comet-level event in the world of subscriptions is occurring at Microsoft: the company announced it will lower the price of its Game Pass Ultimate from $29.99 to $22.99.

The move comes a little over a week after reports revealed an internal memo from new Xbox head Asha Sharma in which the exec told employees that Game Pass has “become too expensive.” Back in October, before Sharma’s tenure began, Xbox hiked its Game Pass subscription by 50%.

With the price drop, Game Pass will also see a major shift: new “Call of Duty” titles will no longer be added to the service at launch, instead joining the library about a year later during the following holiday season. The subscription will still cost a bit more than it did before the popular titles were added in 2024.

According to estimates reported by Bloomberg, the decision to put “Call of Duty” on Game Pass cost Xbox more than $300 million.

culture

The most popular male and female names in the US, according to the latest Census

New data published Tuesday by the US Census Bureau has revealed the most common names provided in the 2020 Census, in the first release to include forename data since 1990.

As described in the brief, Michael was the most popular name for males in the US, with roughly 3.5 million American men reporting having this name or a close variant. This is up from fourth place in the 1990 Census, when the top US male name was James — though there were still 3 million Jameses in 2020’s tally.

Despite a three-decade gap, Mary remained the top name for American females in both censuses, with the 2020 survey counting almost 1.8 million females with this given name. Interestingly, Mary was one of just two predominantly female names that broke the top 10 given names in the US, with the overall list dominated mostly by male monikers.

Most popular names US census 2020 chart
Sherwood News

In all, American females had far more first-name diversity than male counterparts: 16% of US males had one of the top 10 most frequent names among men, compared with 7.8% of women. Zooming out, almost 3x as many given names were needed to cover a quarter of the US female population than that of males.

culture

6 months after hiking Game Pass prices by 50%, Xbox determines it may be too expensive

Microsoft’s new Xbox chief, Asha Sharma, thinks the division’s recent price hikes have been a mistake, per an internal memo to employees seen by The Verge.

“Short term, Game Pass has become too expensive for players, so we need a better value equation,” Sharma’s memo reportedly read.

It’s an interesting take, given that Xbox hiked the price of its Game Pass subscription by 50% in October, before Sharma took over. The memo is a signal that Sharma’s tenure — which began in February, taking the industry by surprise — will include some big changes for Microsoft’s gaming strategy.

Whether Game Pass prices will drop is not yet clear. Last month, The Information reported that Sharma and Netflix co-CEO Greg Peters have “kicked around ideas” about potential bundles. That would fit with Netflix’s renewed gaming ambitions.

Xbox Game Pass Chartr
(Sherwood News)

It’s an interesting take, given that Xbox hiked the price of its Game Pass subscription by 50% in October, before Sharma took over. The memo is a signal that Sharma’s tenure — which began in February, taking the industry by surprise — will include some big changes for Microsoft’s gaming strategy.

Whether Game Pass prices will drop is not yet clear. Last month, The Information reported that Sharma and Netflix co-CEO Greg Peters have “kicked around ideas” about potential bundles. That would fit with Netflix’s renewed gaming ambitions.

Xbox Game Pass Chartr
(Sherwood News)

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.