Business
An Airbnb in Turkey.
A handmade Airbnb sign on a home in Turkey. (Jens Kalaene/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Weird Money

Self-proclaimed ‘Wolf of Airbnb’ speedruns the Wolf of Wall Street, headed to prison

J'accuse!

Jack Raines

Some of the more entertaining wire fraud lawsuits over the last few years have been cases involving folks who illegally obtained Paycheck Protection Program loans. Few, if any, PPP wire fraud cases have been more entertaining than that of Konrad Bicher, the self-proclaimed “Wolf of Airbnb.” From Bloomberg:

A Florida man who styled himself the “Wolf of Airbnb” will serve 4 1/4 years in prison after admitting he defrauded New York City landlords by illegally listing apartments for short-term rental. Konrad Bicher, 32, was sentenced on Monday after pleading guilty last year to a single count of wire fraud.

Prosecutors said Bicher leased more than a dozen apartments in Manhattan that the city had barred from short-term rental to third parties or that couldn’t be subleased without the owner’s consent. They say he failed to pay the rent while listing the units on marketplaces including Airbnb. He and his associates made at least $1.17 million in income from the units while withholding more than $1 million in rent between July 2019 and April 2022, according to the US.

Bicher was also accused of obtaining more than half a million dollars in loans guaranteed by the government through a Small Business Administration program designed to provide relief for companies affected by the pandemic.

Consider me shocked, and I mean shocked, that the guy who idolized Jordan Belfort, the former stockbroker who spent 22 months in federal prison and was ordered to repay $110 million in restitution, committed wire fraud. This quote, from the jury’s indictment, is just perfect:

During the course of the scheme, Konrad Bicher, the defendant, referred to himself as the “Wolf of Airbnb,” and explained to media outlets that this nickname referred to the fact that he was “hungry and ruthless enough to get on top of the financial ladder” and had the “ferocity… of a wolf, because wolves are territorial, vicious and show no mercy when provoked.”

Curbed published an entertaining profile on Bicher in November 2022, and The Real Deal first covered various landlords suing the Wolf in February 2022. Both pieces are worth reading in full, but to summarize the situation:

Bicher, originally a Mennonite from rural Pennsylvania, moved to New York when he was 23, and he lived in a two-bedroom apartment in Inwood. To reduce costs, he rented out the spare bedroom in his apartment, and then he had the giga-brain idea that he could make even more money by renting and subletting even more apartments around the city. Over the next eight years, he leased dozens of apartments and listed them on Airbnb, Craigslist, and other short-term rental sites.

There are a couple of things wrong with this picture: 1) most New York City landlords prohibit subletting, and 2) New York City has strict rules regarding short-term rentals, leading to multiple lawsuits during the time that Bicher was operating (see here and here, for example) concerning illegal listings.

Bicher was renting some apartments to short-term tenants, occasionally double-booking the same unit, and he rented out one high-end unit by the hour to photographers and influencers for photo shoots. He was sued by at  least two landlords in 2019 and 2020 for subletting apartments, but the cases were dismissed because the landlords failed to serve Bicher (correctly “serving” a tenant is a tedious process. For example, papers left with a neighbor or doorman aren’t considered to be “served” correctly).

Once the pandemic hit, Bicher went a step further: he stopped paying rent while continuing to sublet the apartments, making an estimated $1.17 million in rent while paying nothing, and he falsified IRS documentation to obtain more than $565,000 in PPP loans. Naturally, he was also referring to himself as “The Wolf of Airbnb” on Instagram at this time, posting pictures of himself on private jets and driving Ferraris. Most of Bicher’s lawsuits, per the Curbed article, stemmed from not paying rent, and eventually, the FBI investigated him for PPP fraud.

The irony of this whole situation is that, if Bicher had simply continued to pay his rent, and not illegally obtained $565,000 in PPP loans, he might not be going to prison right now? The two subletting-related lawsuits Bicher faced before the pandemic were dismissed, and I imagine that most landlords won’t want to deal with the headache of a years-long litigation process as long as they’re getting paid. But if you stop paying rent and tell your landlord’s attorney, “This is my home and i live here, due to the pandemic i can not legally be evicted. If these accusations do not stop i will need to retain my attorneys and sue,” you shouldn’t really be surprised if you do end up in court and, eventually, prison.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.