Business
President Biden Speaks At The Intel Ocotillo Campus In Arizona
Intel CEO Patrick Gelsinger in Chandler, Arizona (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

Even an $8.5 billion government windfall couldn’t save Intel

Intel may have landed a big government contract, but investors are growing tired of waiting for results.

Over the last 20 years or so, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) has become the global leader in chip manufacturing, now controlling roughly 60% of the semiconductor foundry market. Foundries are 3rd-party chip manufacturers. Companies like AMD, Nvidia, and Apple design their chips in the US, but they rely on TSMC to manufacture their most-advanced semiconductors in its foundries in Taiwan. The reason for this is two-fold:

  1. Chip manufacturing is a capital–intensive business, and many companies prefer to outsource this process vs. scaling their own production.

  2. TSMC has the world’s most advanced manufacturing capabilities, currently producing 3-nanometer (nm) chips. (For context, Intel’s most-advanced mass-production chip is still 7nm).

The problem with TSMC dominating the chip manufacturing industry is that it presents heightened geopolitical risks for the US. TSMC is, as the name suggests, located in Taiwan. China’s ongoing conflict with Taiwan risks supply chain disruptions that could have ripple effects in the US economy, as most of our most-advanced chips are manufactured in Taiwan. 

On March 20, 2024, to address the risk of outsourcing manufacturing of our most advanced chips to Taiwan, the US government committed up to $8.5 billion (along with $11 billion in loans) to Intel, through the CHIPS and Science Act to support construction and expansion of Intel facilities in Arizona, Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon.

The goal with the investment was to expand US domestic chip-manufacturing capabilities, not just for Intel, but for the broader chip market. The US government wants a competitive foundry on its home turf. Last summer, Intel separated its “foundry” business’s financials from the rest of the company, making it an independent operating unit, and at the IFS Direct Connect Conference in February 2024, Intel’s CEO Pat Gelsinger noted that he wanted Intel’s foundry business to eventually produce chips for Nvidia, Qualcomm, Google, Microsoft, and even AMD. 

So, how is Intel’s foundry business doing with that additional $8.5 billion in funding?

Not great!

Intel reported lackluster earnings last week, with a 1% decline in year-over-year revenue and a $1.61 billion operating loss, including a $2.8 billion loss stemming from its Foundry unit that generated $4.3 billion in revenue (4% year over year growth). Even worse, the company stated that it was slashing 17,500 jobs and suspending its dividend just five months after announcing that the CHIPS Act funding would create almost 30,000 jobs.

Management noted that investments in Intel Foundry would continue weighing on operating profits through 2024, but the business would reach breakeven soon-after. However, investors have grown tired of Intel’s pattern of missed deadlines, especially after the company already pushed back the initial timeline for its new Ohio factory from 2025 to late 2026 amid “market challenges,” and the stock fell by 29% on Friday morning, in its biggest decline since 1974.

Maybe Intel’s heavy spending will pay off, but for now, investors certainly aren’t pleased. Plus, it’s never a good sign when your CEO’s response to the sharpest stock sell off in decades is quoting Old Testament Proverbs:

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.