Business
TAIWAN-COMPUTERS-SEMICONDUCTORS-AI-COMPUTEX
Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang (SAM YEH/AFP via Getty Images)
Weird Money

What happens if Nvidia employees hit their “number?”

If your star employees are all exhausted millionaires, how long can you keep it going?

Jack Raines

In case you missed it, Nvidia had their quarterly earnings report yesterday, and the semiconductor juggernaut recorded $30 billion in revenue and $16.9 billion in net income as big tech companies continue spending money hand-over-fist to build their AI offerings.

One reason that Nvidia has done so well is that, thanks to its market dominance, it can flex its pricing power on customers, as seen in its 75.1% gross margins last quarter.

But the big question now is, how long will Nvidia’s dominance continue? Competition from its own customers is a risk, as big tech companies are now investing in their own chips to diversify away from Nvidia’s products. However, another risk, which I haven’t seen discussed as much, is Nvidia’s ability to keep its employees motivated now that they’re rich.

From Bloomberg:

Nvidia stock has gained 3,776% since the start of 2019 as the company benefits from selling the main chip necessary for artificial intelligence work, minting many new multimillionaires in the process. But the work hours are just as grueling and high-stress, current and former employees said, leaving little time for the jet-setting, homebuying and leisure many can now afford. A culture problem is brewing, said the 10 people, who asked not to be identified for fear of retribution…

One former employee, who worked in technical support for enterprise clients, said he was expected to work 7 days a week, often until 1 a.m. or 2 a.m. He said many of his former colleagues, especially those on engineering teams, worked longer hours. He described the environment as a pressure cooker, noting several company meetings he characterized as yelling fights — but said the pay package made it hard to leave. He left in May and requested anonymity to speak frankly about the company.

Another, who worked in marketing until 2022 and requested anonymity to protect her career, said she often attended 7 to 10 meetings per day, each with more than 30 people involved, often punctuated by bouts of fighting and shouting. But she said she put up with it for two years, because of the “golden handcuffs” — the opportunity for even more wealth.

I compared Nvidia’s historic headcount, stock-based compensation, and stock price appreciation to estimate how valuable those “golden handcuffs” might be.

RSUs, or restricted stock units, are a common form of stock-based compensation, and the grant price used to determine the number of shares awarded is typically based on the stock price around the time an employee joins (for example, in a forum on anonymous professional networking site Teamblind, a current Nvidia employee noted that his RSU grant price was based on the “first week in the calendar month after the month of joining”).

If, for example, your contract stated that you would earn $100,000 in RSU compensation, and your company’s stock price was $100 for your entire first year, you would be paid 1,000 shares. If your RSUs vest over multiple years, you will be paid the same number of shares each year, regardless of the stock price, meaning that if the stock price increases (or decreases), the value of your RSUs will increase (or decrease).

Per employee salary information site levels.fyi, Nvidia’s RSUs vest over four years, meaning that RSUs for employees who joined 2-4 years ago are now worth a lot. The table below shows the annual value of the average employee’s RSUs, based on the Nvidia’s end-of-year price year in their starting year and Nvidia’s current stock price of $120*:

The average Nvidia employee earned $73,623 in stock-based compensation in 2020 when Nvidia’s stock was $13 per share. An employee who started at the end of 2020, earning $73,623 in 2020 RSUs, would make $679,598.66 in RSUs alone in 2024, assuming the stock remains around its current price of $120. If the average employee who started in 2020 held all of their RSUs over the last four years, they would have approximately $2.7 million right now. Even if they sold at the end of year each year, they would have netted $1.2 million. The bottom row of the table above shows much much the average employee is making in 2024 RSUs, based on their start date.

Over the last four years, Nvidia’s employee turnover rate has been well-below the market average, with its current turnover rate only 2.7%, down from 5.3% last year. But given that so many of Nvidia’s employees have now made millions from its stock price appreciation, you have to wonder how many will opt for retirement over the grueling 24/7 grindset? While Wall Street is focused on customer demand, I think the biggest risk facing Nvidia is an employee exodus.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.