Business
Biden announces cancellation of an additional $1.2 billion in student loan debt for about 153,000 borrowers.
President Joe Biden announcing the cancellation of an additional $1.2 billion in student loan debt (Irfan Khan/Getty Images)
Weird Money

How PE firms could be the unlikely beneficiaries of Biden's student-loan forgiveness plan

Private equity is buying up private student loan debt by the billions. The government forgiving federal student debt could make their purchases less risky.

Jack Raines

In the latest rendition of “private equity firms are eating the world,” KKR and Carlyle have acquired $10 billion in private student loans from Discover Financial, per The Wall Street Journal:

Private-equity firms are helping traditional lenders shed credit risks by acquiring student loans even as debt forgiveness remains a hot topic in Washington. 

Carlyle Group and KKR underlined the trend in July, when they bought a $10.1 billion portfolio of private student loans at auction from Discover Financial Services, a digital banking and payment services company, with the purchase price expected to reach about $10.8 billion once the deal closes later this year. Half of the loans carry fixed rates and the rest have floating rates, according to the asset managers... 

My first thought when reading this was: “Why?” Yes, these firms have billions of dollars that need to be deployed somewhere, but student loans seemed odd, especially considering the Biden administration’s insistence on forgiving billions of dollars of student loans. However, this forgiveness is actually a tailwind for the loans that these funds purchased, according to Carlyle’s head of credit strategic solutions, Akhil Bansil:

“Forgiveness of the federal student loans can be a credit positive for us as the private student loan owners,” Bansal said. “If the government were to forgive the federal loans, that makes that student more creditworthy to service our loan.” 

Most student borrowers take out both federal and private loans, with interest rates as high as 9% on the former compared with as high as 17% for the latter, according to consumer financial-services company Bankrate.

How does that make sense? Because Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan applies to federal loans, which were issued by the government, not private loans such as those purchased by Carlyle and KKR. 

While the Supreme Court blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to forgive $430 billion in student loans, the White House has still approved nearly $169 billion in loan forgiveness for ~4.8 million people, and according to CNBC, the president may start forgiving this student debt as early as October.

As the Journal piece mentioned, “most student borrowers take out both federal and private loans,” so, if Biden were to forgive $169 billion in federal debt, those borrowers would be able to more easily repay their private loans, many of which are now held by KKR and Carlyle. Basically, the White House's student loan forgiveness plan, while helping borrowers, also had a wild unintended consequence: derisking the loan portfolios of two of the world's largest PE funds.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.